Conspiracist cognition: chaos, convenience, and cause for concern

There has been much concern with the abundance of misinformation in public discourse. Although always played a role political debate, its character shifted from support for specific position to ‘shock and chaos’ stream conspiracy theories. Exposure theories can have considerable adverse impact on society. I argue that scholars therefore responsibility combat generally. Exercising this requires an understanding varied rhetorical roles Here focus instances which people reject unequivocal scientific evidence invoke theories, or radical anti-institutional positions, based ideological imperatives. those positions do not reflect true attitudes. Instead, may deploy extreme rhetoric as pragmatic tool expression. investigate possibility by focusing rejection science. Conspiracist cognition violate epistemic standards underpin Ironically, violation renders useful rationally deployed serves purposes. present study confirms be worldview-motivated denial provide suggestions how debunk defang conspiratorial rhetoric.